Key facts
- The main routes are direct outreach to investigators, institutional research offices and programs, networks, and remote or retrospective projects.
- Authorship follows contribution, using ICMJE criteria that most journals apply.
- Agree on your role, hours, deliverables and authorship expectations before you start.
- Do not pay for authorship or a guaranteed publication.
IMGs find research positions mainly by approaching investigators directly, going through a university or hospital's formal channels, using personal and school networks, or joining remote or retrospective projects. The best positions have a named mentor, a defined project and a clear understanding of authorship from the start. Whether research is worth the time for you is covered in why research matters for IMGs.
Know what you want first #
Before searching, decide:
- Your specialty interest. Research in your target specialty reads more coherently, though any real project can teach skills.
- The kind of work. Chart review, systematic review, database analysis, laboratory work, clinical trial support and case reports each need different skills and time.
- Your constraints. Time zone, visa status, hours per week and whether you can work in person.
- Your goal. A mentor and letter, a publication, a poster, or a skill set. Be realistic about what a short project can produce.
Route 1: Direct outreach #
Cold email is common because it works often enough when it is specific.
- Find people whose work you can describe. Search PubMed and department pages for investigators with recent papers in your area of interest. Read one or two of their papers.
- Write a short, specific email. Say who you are, what you read of theirs, what you can contribute (skills, hours, language, statistics, software), what you want to learn and your availability. Attach a CV.
- Offer something concrete. For example: screening abstracts for a review, cleaning data, helping with literature searches, drafting methods.
- Follow up once or twice. Busy investigators often respond after a reminder.
- Expect many no replies. That is normal and not a judgment of you.
Avoid mass email with generic text. It is both ineffective and visible.
Route 2: Institutional channels #
- Departments and research offices. Many have pages for research assistants, volunteers or visiting scholars, with application procedures.
- Residency programs. Some programs run research tracks or collaborative projects and may accept IMGs for research-only roles.
- Research coordinators. Coordinators often know which labs need help and handle onboarding.
- Fellowships and structured research years. Some are paid, some are not; terms vary widely. Read the terms before applying.
Institutional programs usually require approvals, training in human-subjects research and data privacy, and sometimes a visa. That paperwork is a sign of legitimacy, not an obstacle to avoid.
Route 3: Networks #
Faculty at your own school, alumni already in the US, co-residents from your country, and mentors you met during clinical experience can introduce you to a project. A warm introduction works better than a cold email. Ask if a physician you worked with during USCE has a project (see how to get USCE).
Route 4: Remote and retrospective projects #
Chart reviews, database studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses can often be done remotely, but only with proper data access and approval. A legitimate project has:
- A named principal investigator at an institution.
- Ethics or institutional review board approval or a documented exemption where needed.
- A clear plan for data access that respects patient privacy.
If the project involves patient data, you should not receive identifiable records over informal channels.
Questions to ask before you commit #
| Question | Why |
|---|---|
| Who is the principal investigator and who supervises me day to day? | Accountability and a possible letter |
| What is the project and where is it in the process? | A project at the idea stage may take years |
| What will I do, how many hours, and by when? | Prevents scope creep |
| What authorship can I expect and what would earn it? | Avoids disputes later |
| Is there ethics approval? | Required for most human-subjects work |
| Who will be the corresponding author and how are decisions made? | Clarifies roles |
| Is the target a peer-reviewed journal, a conference, or both? | Sets expectations |
Authorship integrity #
Most journals follow the ICMJE criteria. To be an author you must meet all four: substantial contribution to the conception, design, data acquisition, analysis or interpretation; drafting or critically revising the work; final approval of the version to be published; and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. Contributors who do not meet all four should be acknowledged rather than listed as authors.
In practice that means:
- Ask early what you are expected to do and what authorship that earns.
- Do not expect a place on a paper for doing a task that does not meet the criteria, and do not offer one.
- Do not pay for authorship, to buy a place on a paper, or for a guaranteed publication. That is not research experience, and ECFMG's irregular behavior policy treats misleading or improper submissions seriously.
- Describe your role accurately in ERAS.
What counts at the stage you are in #
Not everything reaches publication, and that is fine. Programs and ERAS let you list work in different stages. See how programs view research for how the categories are read and how to describe work in progress honestly.
Frequently asked questions
Do I need a visa to do research in the US?
Hands-on, paid or in-person research raises visa and work-authorization questions. Remote work for a US team may avoid some of them. Confirm with the host institution and a qualified adviser before you start.
Is it normal to work unpaid?
Volunteer research positions exist, but you should still agree on duties, hours and authorship in writing. Unpaid does not mean unstructured.
Can I do research from my home country?
Often yes, especially for retrospective chart reviews, systematic reviews and data analysis. Check that the project has proper approval and a named mentor.
How long should I stay on a project?
Long enough to contribute meaningfully and see the project through, which may be months or longer. Check the expected timeline at the start.
Sources
- ICMJE: Defining the role of authors and contributors
- NRMP: Charting Outcomes, Characteristics of International Medical Graduates Who Matched to Their Preferred Specialty, 2024
- ECFMG: 2026 Information Booklet, ECFMG Programs and Irregular Behavior
Found something out of date? Tell us and we will check it against the source.